The result

Harver takes the total, HackerRank takes more of the criteria.

Harver holds a 1-point edge over HackerRank under rubric v1.0, 56 to 55, with both scored in the Assessment cohort. HackerRank leads more of the criteria, 3 against 2 for Harver, yet Harver takes Bias Audit Transparency, which carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum with it. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HackerRank 68, Harver 80 — and at an 18% weight it carries 68% of the weighted advantage Harver holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • HackerRank3
  • Harver2
  • Level2
Widest raw gap
Bias Audit Transparency68 vs 80
Heaviest weighted swing
Bias Audit Transparency18% weight

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

HackerRank and Harver are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.

RecordHackerRankHarver
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSNL
Founded20092015

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight42% of the movement so far

    HackerRank68
    Harver80

    2.2 weighted points to Harver

  2. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight66% of the movement so far

    HackerRank60
    Harver50

    1.2 weighted points to HackerRank

  3. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight85% of the movement so far

    HackerRank60
    Harver65

    1.0 weighted points to Harver

  4. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight97% of the movement so far

    HackerRank45
    Harver40

    0.6 weighted points to HackerRank

  5. Customer Documentation

    8% weight100% of the movement so far

    HackerRank62
    Harver60

    0.2 weighted points to HackerRank

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -1.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.2.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HackerRank minus Harver, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightHackerRankHarverΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6065-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%6880-12-2.2
FRIA Support15%3535--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5555--
Human Oversight Design12%6050+10+1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4540+5+0.6
Customer Documentation8%6260+2+0.2
Total100%55F56F-1-1.2

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHackerRankHarver
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%30Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain10—
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%144Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain100Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

HackerRank has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Harver has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 0 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HackerRank sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 28 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for HackerRank, across 3 distinct source domains, and 10 for Harver, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
HackerRank last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Harver last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next