Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harver vs Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Harver
Pre-employment assessment suite covering cognitive ability, behavioral, and situational judgement, including the legacy Pymetrics games product.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Behavioral assessment using browser-based "games" that infer cognitive and emotional traits. Acquired by Harver in 2022 and folded into the Harver Games product line.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
Harver and Pymetrics (Harver Games) tie at 56.
Harver and Pymetrics (Harver Games), both in the Assessment cohort, tie at 56 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Harver leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Pymetrics (Harver Games) 2, with 2 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Harver 35, Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25 — and at a 15% weight it carries 60% of the weighted advantage Harver holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harver3
- Pymetrics (Harver Games)2
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support35 vs 25
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harver and Pymetrics (Harver Games) are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Harver | Pymetrics (Harver Games) |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2013 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight35% of the movement so far
Harver35Pymetrics (Harver Games)251.5 weighted points to Harver
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight59% of the movement so far
Harver65Pymetrics (Harver Games)701.0 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight76% of the movement so far
Harver55Pymetrics (Harver Games)600.8 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight91% of the movement so far
Harver40Pymetrics (Harver Games)350.6 weighted points to Harver
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Harver60Pymetrics (Harver Games)550.4 weighted points to Harver
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +0.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harver minus Pymetrics (Harver Games), coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harver | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 70 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 80 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 50 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 56F | 56F | - | +0.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harver | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Harver has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 0 documented absences; Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Pymetrics (Harver Games) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 21 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 10 for Harver, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harver last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.