§ The result
HireLogic takes the total, HeroHunt.ai takes more of the criteria.
HireLogic holds a 4-point edge over HeroHunt.ai under rubric v1.0, 34 to 30, across the Video interview and Sourcing cohorts. HeroHunt.ai leads more of the criteria, 3 against 2 for HireLogic, yet HireLogic takes Article 11 Technical Documentation, which carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum with it. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HeroHunt.ai 20, HireLogic 42 — and at a 20% weight it carries 83% of the weighted advantage HireLogic holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HireLogic under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireLogic is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | HireLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Low |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2021 | Not recorded |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · HireLogic 42
4.4 weighted points to HireLogic
18% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · HireLogic 15
0.9 weighted points to HireLogic
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · HireLogic 48
0.8 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · HireLogic 25
0.3 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · HireLogic 45
0.2 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -3.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -3.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus HireLogic.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | HireLogic | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 42 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 15 | -5 | -0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 25 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 45 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 48 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 28 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 45 | +3 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 34 (F) | -4 | -3.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | HireLogic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next