§ The result
1 point separates Intervue.io and HeroHunt.ai.
Intervue.io holds a 1-point edge over HeroHunt.ai under rubric v1.0, 31 to 30, across the Video interview and Sourcing cohorts. The 7 criteria split 4 to 3 in favour of Intervue.io: Intervue.io is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and HeroHunt.ai on Data Governance Disclosure. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HeroHunt.ai 20, Intervue.io 28 — and at a 20% weight it carries 68% of the weighted advantage Intervue.io holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Intervue.io under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | IN |
| Founded | 2021 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · Intervue.io 28
1.6 weighted points to Intervue.io
15% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · Intervue.io 38
1.1 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · Intervue.io 22
0.8 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
18% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · Intervue.io 12
0.4 weighted points to Intervue.io
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · Intervue.io 30
0.2 weighted points to Intervue.io
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · Intervue.io 50
0.2 weighted points to Intervue.io
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · Intervue.io 54
0.1 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -0.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus Intervue.io.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 28 | -8 | -1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 12 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 22 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 38 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 54 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 50 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 31 (F) | -1 | -0.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai and Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 69 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next