§ The result
HeroHunt.ai and Moonhub tie at 30.
HeroHunt.ai and Moonhub, both in the Sourcing cohort, tie at 30 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. HeroHunt.ai leads 5 of the 7 criteria and Moonhub 2, yet the two totals land on the same number. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HeroHunt.ai 20, Moonhub 30 — and at a 20% weight it carries 58% of the weighted advantage Moonhub holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai and Moonhub are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | Moonhub |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 2022 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · Moonhub 30
2.0 weighted points to Moonhub
18% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · Moonhub 18
1.4 weighted points to Moonhub
12% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · Moonhub 48
0.8 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
8% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · Moonhub 38
0.8 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · Moonhub 40
0.8 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · Moonhub 22
0.7 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · Moonhub 25
0.3 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to 0.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that 0.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus Moonhub.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Moonhub | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 30 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 18 | -8 | -1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 25 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 40 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 48 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 22 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 38 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 30 (F) | - | 0.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Moonhub | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next