§ The result
TestDome leads HeroHunt.ai by 7 points.
TestDome scores 37 and HeroHunt.ai 30 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. TestDome leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while HeroHunt.ai leads 1, including Human Oversight Design. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (HeroHunt.ai 20, TestDome 40) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 57% of the weighted advantage TestDome holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
TestDome
TestDome sells pay-per-candidate online skills tests for coding, Excel and more than 100 other skills. The tests are scored automatically, and open-ended answers can be scored by AI. AI analysis of webcam and screen proctoring recordings flags possible cheating, and a live code-interview tool is included.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, TestDome under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only TestDome is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | TestDome |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Low |
| Headquarters | NL | HR |
| Founded | 2021 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · TestDome 40
4.0 weighted points to TestDome
8% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · TestDome 60
1.0 weighted points to TestDome
18% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · TestDome 15
0.9 weighted points to TestDome
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · TestDome 50
0.8 weighted points to TestDome
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · TestDome 52
0.4 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · TestDome 30
0.2 weighted points to TestDome
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · TestDome 28
0.1 weighted points to TestDome
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -6.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -6.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus TestDome.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | TestDome | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 40 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 15 | -5 | -0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 28 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 50 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 37 (F) | -7 | -6.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | TestDome | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 27 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; TestDome has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for TestDome, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- TestDome last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next