§ The result
HiredScore leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, HiredScore (Sourcing) opens an 18-point lead on HireLogic (Video interview), 52 to 34. HiredScore leads every one of the 7 criteria, HireLogic none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, HiredScore 30 to HireLogic 25. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HiredScore 55, HireLogic 15 — and at an 18% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage HiredScore holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HiredScore
AI-driven talent orchestration layer that ranks and routes candidates within an existing ATS. Acquired by Workday in 2024.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
§ The record
HiredScore is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HireLogic under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only HireLogic is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HiredScore | HireLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | Not recorded |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HiredScore 55 · HireLogic 15
7.2 weighted points to HiredScore
20% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HiredScore 65 · HireLogic 42
4.6 weighted points to HiredScore
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HiredScore 55 · HireLogic 45
1.5 weighted points to HiredScore
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HiredScore 60 · HireLogic 48
1.4 weighted points to HiredScore
8% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HiredScore 60 · HireLogic 45
1.2 weighted points to HiredScore
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HiredScore 35 · HireLogic 28
0.8 weighted points to HiredScore
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HiredScore 30 · HireLogic 25
0.8 weighted points to HiredScore
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +17.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +18 beside that +17.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiredScore minus HireLogic.
| Category | Weight | HiredScore | HireLogic | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 42 | +23 | +4.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 55 | 15 | +40 | +7.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 45 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 28 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 45 | +15 | +1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 52 (F) | 34 (F) | +18 | +17.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiredScore | HireLogic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 0 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 2 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HiredScore has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HiredScore sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 9 for HiredScore, across 1 distinct source domain, and 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiredScore last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next