Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HiredScore vs Paycom
HiredScore
AI-driven talent orchestration layer that ranks and routes candidates within an existing ATS. Acquired by Workday in 2024.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Paycom
Paycom is a single-database human capital management and payroll platform whose applicant tracking system automates recruiting with resume parsing, keyword/knockout candidate filtering, automated correspondence, generative job-description writing, and a command-driven AI data-query engine (IWant).
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
HiredScore takes the total, Paycom takes more of the criteria.
HiredScore (Sourcing) edges Paycom (ATS-integrated) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 52 to 50. Paycom leads more of the criteria than HiredScore — 3 to 2 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which HiredScore leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to HiredScore. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HiredScore 55, Paycom 38) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 84% of the weighted advantage HiredScore holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HiredScore2
- Paycom3
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency55 vs 38
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HiredScore is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Paycom under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Paycom is in scope of
| Record | HiredScore | Paycom |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 1998 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight54% of the movement so far
HiredScore55Paycom383.1 weighted points to HiredScore
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight72% of the movement so far
HiredScore55Paycom621.1 weighted points to Paycom
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight83% of the movement so far
HiredScore65Paycom680.6 weighted points to Paycom
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight94% of the movement so far
HiredScore60Paycom550.6 weighted points to HiredScore
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
HiredScore35Paycom380.4 weighted points to Paycom
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +1.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +1.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiredScore minus Paycom, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HiredScore | Paycom | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 68 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 55 | 38 | +17 | +3.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 62 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 52F | 50F | +2 | +1.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiredScore | Paycom | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 2 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 13 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
HiredScore has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Paycom has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HiredScore sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 29 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 9 for HiredScore, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Paycom, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiredScore last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Paycom last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.