HomeCompareHiredScore vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HiredScore vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

1 point separates SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting and HiredScore.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting (ATS-integrated) edges HiredScore (Sourcing) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 53 to 52. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while HiredScore leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency. Bias Audit Transparency is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to HiredScore — HiredScore 55, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40, on an 18% weight — which is 100% of the weighted advantage HiredScore holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.

§ The record

HiredScore is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordHiredScoreSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSDE
Founded20121972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 44% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HiredScore 55 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    2.7 weighted points to HiredScore

  2. 20% weight · 60% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HiredScore 65 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    1.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 15% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HiredScore 30 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 15% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HiredScore 55 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HiredScore 35 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    0.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HiredScore 60 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HiredScore 60 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -0.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HiredScore minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightHiredScoreSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6570-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%5540+15+2.7
FRIA Support15%3035-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5560-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%6062-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3540-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%6062-2-0.2
Total100%52 (F)53 (F)-1-0.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHiredScoreSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%10Audit reportSources on a separate domain21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%10Sources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on a separate domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%0121Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%10Sources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%72Audit reportSources on a separate domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HiredScore has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HiredScore and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 31 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 9 for HiredScore, across 1 distinct source domain, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HiredScore last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.