Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HireLogic vs Qureos
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
Qureos
Qureos is a Dubai-based AI recruiting platform whose Iris agents source candidates, score and rank applicants against recruiter-set criteria, and run AI voice and video interviews with personality scoring, alongside an ATS and a job-seeker marketplace focused on MENA and South Asia.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
1 point separates HireLogic and Qureos.
HireLogic (Video interview) edges Qureos (Screening) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 34 to 33. HireLogic and Qureos each lead 3 of the 7 criteria, with 1 level, though the side of the split HireLogic holds (headed by Article 11 Technical Documentation) adds up to more weighted points. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (HireLogic 42, Qureos 28) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 80% of the weighted advantage HireLogic holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HireLogic3
- Qureos3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation42 vs 28
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, Qureos under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HireLogic | Qureos |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AE |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2021 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight50% of the movement so far
HireLogic42Qureos282.8 weighted points to HireLogic
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight65% of the movement so far
HireLogic28Qureos350.8 weighted points to Qureos
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight78% of the movement so far
HireLogic48Qureos540.7 weighted points to Qureos
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight88% of the movement so far
HireLogic45Qureos520.6 weighted points to Qureos
- 5
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight97% of the movement so far
HireLogic15Qureos120.5 weighted points to HireLogic
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
HireLogic45Qureos440.1 weighted points to HireLogic
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus Qureos, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | Qureos | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 28 | +14 | +2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 12 | +3 | +0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 44 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 54 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 52 | -7 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 34F | 33F | +1 | +1.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | Qureos | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Qureos has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 35 for Qureos, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Qureos last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.