§ The result
3 points separate TestDome and HireLogic.
TestDome (Assessment) edges HireLogic (Video interview) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 37 to 34. HireLogic takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them, against 5 for TestDome, whose share includes Customer Documentation, and 1 is level. The advantage TestDome holds is spread out: Customer Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HireLogic 45, TestDome 60, 8% weight), yet it supplies only 38% of the weighted points TestDome gains across the 5 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
TestDome
TestDome sells pay-per-candidate online skills tests for coding, Excel and more than 100 other skills. The tests are scored automatically, and open-ended answers can be scored by AI. AI analysis of webcam and screen proctoring recordings flags possible cheating, and a live code-interview tool is included.
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, TestDome under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | HireLogic | TestDome |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Low |
| Headquarters | US | HR |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
8% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · TestDome 60
1.2 weighted points to TestDome
15% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · TestDome 50
0.8 weighted points to TestDome
12% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · TestDome 52
0.5 weighted points to TestDome
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · TestDome 28
0.4 weighted points to TestDome
20% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · TestDome 40
0.4 weighted points to HireLogic
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · TestDome 30
0.2 weighted points to TestDome
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -2.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -2.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus TestDome.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | TestDome | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 40 | +2 | +0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 15 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 50 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 52 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 37 (F) | -3 | -2.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | TestDome | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 27 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; TestDome has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 60 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 31 for TestDome, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- TestDome last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next