Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HireLogic vs Zappyhire
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
Zappyhire
Zappyhire is an AI-powered recruitment automation platform that screens and ranks candidates through resume parsing, a recruiting chatbot, AI assessments, and robotic video interviews, layered on an applicant tracking system.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
HireLogic and Zappyhire tie at 34.
HireLogic, filed under Video interview, and Zappyhire, filed under Screening, tie at 34 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. HireLogic leads 2 of the 7 criteria and Zappyhire 2, with 3 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. HireLogic takes the heaviest weighted swing, Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (HireLogic 42, Zappyhire 30), which is 84% of the weighted advantage HireLogic holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, HireLogic 15 to Zappyhire 28.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HireLogic2
- Zappyhire2
- Level3
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency15 vs 28
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, Zappyhire under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HireLogic | Zappyhire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight44% of the movement so far
HireLogic42Zappyhire302.4 weighted points to HireLogic
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight87% of the movement so far
HireLogic15Zappyhire282.3 weighted points to Zappyhire
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight96% of the movement so far
HireLogic45Zappyhire420.4 weighted points to HireLogic
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
HireLogic48Zappyhire500.2 weighted points to Zappyhire
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to +0.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus Zappyhire, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | Zappyhire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 30 | +12 | +2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 28 | -13 | -2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 42 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 50 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 28 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 45 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 34F | 34F | - | +0.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | Zappyhire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Zappyhire has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Zappyhire sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Zappyhire, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Zappyhire last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.