Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HireQuotient vs JobDiva
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
HireQuotient leads JobDiva on 5 of the 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, HireQuotient, filed under Sourcing, finishes on 34 and JobDiva, filed under ATS-integrated, on 29, 5 points apart. JobDiva is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: HireQuotient takes 5, the remaining 2 are level, and the nearest of those 5 is Data Governance Disclosure, HireQuotient 40 to JobDiva 38. Human Oversight Design is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireQuotient 57, JobDiva 40 — and at a 12% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage HireQuotient holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HireQuotient5
- JobDiva0
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design57 vs 40
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Human Oversight Design12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only HireQuotient is in scope of
| Record | HireQuotient | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | SG | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 2003 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Human Oversight Design
12% weight41% of the movement so far
HireQuotient57JobDiva402.0 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight70% of the movement so far
HireQuotient35JobDiva281.4 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 3
Customer Documentation
8% weight83% of the movement so far
HireQuotient50JobDiva420.6 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 4
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight94% of the movement so far
HireQuotient18JobDiva150.5 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
HireQuotient40JobDiva380.3 weighted points to HireQuotient
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +4.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireQuotient minus JobDiva, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HireQuotient | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 28 | +7 | +1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 15 | +3 | +0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 22 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 38 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 40 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 42 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 34F | 29F | +5 | +4.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireQuotient | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.