§ The result
HireVue leads Pulsifi on all 7 criteria.
HireVue (Video interview) and Pulsifi (Assessment) are 25 points apart under rubric v1.0, 58 for HireVue against 33 for Pulsifi. HireVue leads every one of the 7 criteria, Pulsifi none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, HireVue 60 to Pulsifi 55. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireVue 80, Pulsifi 20 — and at an 18% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage HireVue holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HireVue
Asynchronous video interviewing platform with optional AI-driven assessment scoring of candidate responses.
Vendor profile
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
§ The record
HireVue is filed under Video interview AI, Pulsifi under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Mobley v. Workday, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | HireVue | Pulsifi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2004 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireVue 80 · Pulsifi 20
10.8 weighted points to HireVue
20% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireVue 65 · Pulsifi 30
7.0 weighted points to HireVue
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireVue 55 · Pulsifi 40
2.3 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireVue 45 · Pulsifi 28
2.0 weighted points to HireVue
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireVue 35 · Pulsifi 25
1.5 weighted points to HireVue
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireVue 55 · Pulsifi 46
0.7 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireVue 60 · Pulsifi 55
0.6 weighted points to HireVue
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +24.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +25 beside that +24.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireVue minus Pulsifi.
| Category | Weight | HireVue | Pulsifi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 30 | +35 | +7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 20 | +60 | +10.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 28 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 46 | +9 | +0.7 |
| Total | 100% | 58 (F) | 33 (F) | +25 | +24.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireVue | Pulsifi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HireVue sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireVue last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next