HomeCompareHireVue vs Talogy

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireVue vs Talogy

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

HireVue leads Talogy by 16 points.

HireVue finishes 16 points clear of Talogy under rubric v1.0 — 58 against 42 — across the Video interview and Assessment cohorts. HireVue leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Talogy leads 1, including Customer Documentation. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireVue 80, Talogy 30 — and at an 18% weight it carries 57% of the weighted advantage HireVue holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

HireVue is filed under Video interview AI, Talogy under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Mobley v. Workday, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act.

RecordHireVueTalogy
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20041946

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireVue 80 · Talogy 30

    9.0 weighted points to HireVue

  2. 20% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireVue 65 · Talogy 53

    2.4 weighted points to HireVue

  3. 12% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireVue 45 · Talogy 32

    1.6 weighted points to HireVue

  4. 15% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HireVue 35 · Talogy 25

    1.5 weighted points to HireVue

  5. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireVue 60 · Talogy 52

    1.0 weighted points to HireVue

  6. 15% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HireVue 55 · Talogy 52

    0.4 weighted points to HireVue

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireVue 55 · Talogy 58

    0.2 weighted points to Talogy

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +15.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +15.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireVue minus Talogy.

CategoryWeightHireVueTalogyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6553+12+2.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%8030+50+9.0
FRIA Support15%3525+10+1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5552+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%6052+8+1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%4532+13+1.6
Customer Documentation8%5558-3-0.2
Total100%58 (F)42 (F)+16+15.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireVueTalogy
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain32Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%0112
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%1131Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%132Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain229Sources on the vendor's own domain

HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Talogy has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 22 with a source URL, 9 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HireVue sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains, and 28 for Talogy, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
HireVue last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Talogy last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.