Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Hogan Assessments vs Interviewer.AI
Hogan Assessments
Hogan Assessments provides science-based personality assessments - chiefly the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI), Hogan Development Survey (HDS), and Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory (MVPI) - used to predict workplace performance for employee selection and development.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
Hogan Assessments and Interviewer.AI tie at 47.
Hogan Assessments, filed under Assessment, and Interviewer.AI, filed under Video interview, tie at 47 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Hogan Assessments leads 4 of the 7 criteria and Interviewer.AI 3, yet the two totals land on the same number. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Hogan Assessments 44, Interviewer.AI 35 — and at an 18% weight it carries 53% of the weighted advantage Hogan Assessments holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Hogan Assessments4
- Interviewer.AI3
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency44 vs 35
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Hogan Assessments is filed under Assessment AI, Interviewer.AI under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Hogan Assessments | Interviewer.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 1987 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight29% of the movement so far
Hogan Assessments44Interviewer.AI351.6 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight50% of the movement so far
Hogan Assessments52Interviewer.AI601.2 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight67% of the movement so far
Hogan Assessments52Interviewer.AI601.0 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight84% of the movement so far
Hogan Assessments40Interviewer.AI321.0 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight92% of the movement so far
Hogan Assessments50Interviewer.AI520.4 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight97% of the movement so far
Hogan Assessments62Interviewer.AI580.3 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
- 7
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Hogan Assessments36Interviewer.AI350.1 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Hogan Assessments minus Interviewer.AI, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Hogan Assessments | Interviewer.AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 52 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 44 | 35 | +9 | +1.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 36 | 35 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 32 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 58 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 47F | - | +0.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Hogan Assessments | Interviewer.AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Hogan Assessments has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Hogan Assessments, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Hogan Assessments last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.