Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Humanly vs Talogy
Humanly
Conversational AI for high-volume recruiting that engages, screens, and schedules candidates across chat, SMS, email, voice, and video, with structured AI interviews and automated scoring.
Substantial gaps
Screening
Talogy
Talogy sells psychometric talent-assessment products - cognitive ability tests (Logiks, Mindgage), personality inventories (Caliper, P.A.P.I.), values-based screening, situational judgement and job simulations, and 360 feedback - delivered through its TalogyTech platform for candidate selection and employee development.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
Humanly and Talogy tie at 42.
Humanly, filed under Screening, and Talogy, filed under Assessment, tie at 42 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Humanly leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Talogy 4, yet the two totals land on the same number. Humanly takes the heaviest weighted swing, Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (Humanly 40, Talogy 30), which is 45% of the weighted advantage Humanly holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Data Governance Disclosure, Humanly 40 to Talogy 52.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Humanly3
- Talogy4
- Widest raw gap
- Data Governance Disclosure40 vs 52
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Humanly is filed under Screening AI, Talogy under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Humanly | Talogy |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2018 | 1946 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight22% of the movement so far
Humanly40Talogy301.8 weighted points to Humanly
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight44% of the movement so far
Humanly40Talogy521.8 weighted points to Talogy
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight64% of the movement so far
Humanly45Talogy531.6 weighted points to Talogy
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight82% of the movement so far
Humanly35Talogy251.5 weighted points to Humanly
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight91% of the movement so far
Humanly58Talogy520.7 weighted points to Humanly
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight97% of the movement so far
Humanly52Talogy580.5 weighted points to Talogy
- 7
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Humanly30Talogy320.2 weighted points to Talogy
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -0.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Humanly minus Talogy, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Humanly | Talogy | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 53 | -8 | -1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 52 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 52 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 32 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 42F | 42F | - | -0.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Humanly | Talogy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 2 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 22 | 9 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Talogy has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 22 with a source URL, 9 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains, and 28 for Talogy, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Humanly last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Talogy last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.