Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Interviewer.AI vs Sova Assessment
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
Sova Assessment
Sova Assessment is a UK-based enterprise talent assessment platform combining personality questionnaires, cognitive and ability tests, situational judgement, video interviews, virtual assessment centres and AI-led role simulations into a single occupational-psychology-validated candidate scoring workflow.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates Sova Assessment and Interviewer.AI.
Sova Assessment (Assessment) edges Interviewer.AI (Video interview) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 48 to 47. Interviewer.AI takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Data Governance Disclosure among them, against 5 for Sova Assessment, whose share includes Post-Market Monitoring. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing are the same criterion, Data Governance Disclosure, and Interviewer.AI holds it (Interviewer.AI 60, Sova Assessment 52, 15% weight), worth 67% of the weighted advantage Interviewer.AI builds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Interviewer.AI2
- Sova Assessment5
- Widest raw gap
- Data Governance Disclosure60 vs 52
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Data Governance Disclosure15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Interviewer.AI is filed under Video interview AI, Sova Assessment under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Interviewer.AI | Sova Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | SG | GB |
| Founded | 2018 | 2015 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight24% of the movement so far
Interviewer.AI60Sova Assessment521.2 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight43% of the movement so far
Interviewer.AI32Sova Assessment401.0 weighted points to Sova Assessment
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight59% of the movement so far
Interviewer.AI35Sova Assessment400.8 weighted points to Sova Assessment
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight71% of the movement so far
Interviewer.AI52Sova Assessment550.6 weighted points to Sova Assessment
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight83% of the movement so far
Interviewer.AI60Sova Assessment550.6 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
- 6
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight94% of the movement so far
Interviewer.AI35Sova Assessment380.5 weighted points to Sova Assessment
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Interviewer.AI58Sova Assessment620.3 weighted points to Sova Assessment
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Interviewer.AI minus Sova Assessment, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Interviewer.AI | Sova Assessment | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 40 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 40 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 62 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 48F | -1 | -1.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Interviewer.AI | Sova Assessment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Sova Assessment has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Sova Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain, and 34 for Sova Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Sova Assessment last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.