Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Intervue.io vs Qureos
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
Qureos
Qureos is a Dubai-based AI recruiting platform whose Iris agents source candidates, score and rank applicants against recruiter-set criteria, and run AI voice and video interviews with personality scoring, alongside an ATS and a job-seeker marketplace focused on MENA and South Asia.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Qureos leads Intervue.io on 4 of the 7 criteria.
Qureos (Screening) edges Intervue.io (Video interview) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 33 to 31. Qureos leads 4 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 3 are level, so Intervue.io is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 4 Qureos leads is Customer Documentation, Intervue.io 50 to Qureos 52. One criterion, Data Governance Disclosure, is both the widest raw gap (Intervue.io 38, Qureos 44) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 15% weight it makes up 43% of the weighted advantage Qureos holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Intervue.io0
- Qureos4
- Level3
- Widest raw gap
- Data Governance Disclosure38 vs 44
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Data Governance Disclosure15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Qureos under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Intervue.io | Qureos |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | AE |
| Founded | 2020 | 2021 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight43% of the movement so far
Intervue.io38Qureos440.9 weighted points to Qureos
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight71% of the movement so far
Intervue.io30Qureos350.6 weighted points to Qureos
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight92% of the movement so far
Intervue.io22Qureos250.4 weighted points to Qureos
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Intervue.io50Qureos520.2 weighted points to Qureos
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to -2.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -2.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Qureos, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Qureos | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 28 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 12 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 44 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 54 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 52 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31F | 33F | -2 | -2.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Qureos | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Qureos has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 72 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 35 for Qureos, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Qureos last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.