§ The result
TestDome leads Intervue.io by 6 points.
TestDome scores 37 and Intervue.io 31 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. Intervue.io takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Human Oversight Design among them, against 5 for TestDome, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation, and 1 is level. The advantage TestDome holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Intervue.io 28, TestDome 40, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 37% of the weighted points TestDome gains across the 5 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
TestDome
TestDome sells pay-per-candidate online skills tests for coding, Excel and more than 100 other skills. The tests are scored automatically, and open-ended answers can be scored by AI. AI analysis of webcam and screen proctoring recordings flags possible cheating, and a live code-interview tool is included.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, TestDome under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Intervue.io | TestDome |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | IN | HR |
| Founded | 2020 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · TestDome 40
2.4 weighted points to TestDome
15% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · TestDome 50
1.8 weighted points to TestDome
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · TestDome 28
0.9 weighted points to TestDome
8% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · TestDome 60
0.8 weighted points to TestDome
18% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · TestDome 15
0.5 weighted points to TestDome
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · TestDome 52
0.2 weighted points to Intervue.io
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -6.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -6.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus TestDome.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | TestDome | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 40 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 15 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 28 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 50 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 52 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 37 (F) | -6 | -6.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | TestDome | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 27 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; TestDome has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 68 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for TestDome, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- TestDome last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next