§ The result
X0PA AI leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
X0PA AI finishes 17 points clear of Intervue.io under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 31 — across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. Of the 7 criteria Intervue.io wins none, and the narrowest lead X0PA AI holds is on Human Oversight Design, Intervue.io 54 to X0PA AI 57. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Intervue.io 12, X0PA AI 44, 18% weight), is only 33% of the weighted advantage X0PA AI builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
X0PA AI
X0PA AI is a Singapore-based B2B AI recruitment platform (applicant tracking system) that sources, screens, scores, and ranks candidates using proprietary predictive-scoring models (BRIQ Score and Suitability Score) plus the X0PA ROOM video-interview/assessment product, marketed around bias-reduced, "responsible and explainable" AI hiring.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, X0PA AI under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Intervue.io | X0PA AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | IN | SG |
| Founded | 2020 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · X0PA AI 44
5.8 weighted points to X0PA AI
20% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · X0PA AI 50
4.4 weighted points to X0PA AI
15% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · X0PA AI 56
2.7 weighted points to X0PA AI
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · X0PA AI 38
2.4 weighted points to X0PA AI
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · X0PA AI 40
1.2 weighted points to X0PA AI
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · X0PA AI 60
0.8 weighted points to X0PA AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · X0PA AI 57
0.4 weighted points to X0PA AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -17.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus X0PA AI.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | X0PA AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 50 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 44 | -32 | -5.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 38 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 56 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 57 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 48 (F) | -17 | -17.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | X0PA AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; X0PA AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io and X0PA AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for X0PA AI, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- X0PA AI last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next