Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
JobDiva vs Moonhub
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
1 point separates Moonhub and JobDiva.
Moonhub (Sourcing) edges JobDiva (ATS-integrated) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 30 to 29. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Moonhub: Moonhub is ahead on Human Oversight Design and JobDiva on Post-Market Monitoring. Human Oversight Design is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (JobDiva 40, Moonhub 48, 12% weight), but it accounts for only 36% of the weighted advantage Moonhub holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- JobDiva2
- Moonhub5
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design40 vs 48
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Human Oversight Design12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Moonhub under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Moonhub is in scope of
| Record | JobDiva | Moonhub |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 2022 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Human Oversight Design
12% weight24% of the movement so far
JobDiva40Moonhub481.0 weighted points to Moonhub
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight49% of the movement so far
JobDiva30Moonhub221.0 weighted points to JobDiva
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight63% of the movement so far
JobDiva15Moonhub180.5 weighted points to Moonhub
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight74% of the movement so far
JobDiva22Moonhub250.4 weighted points to Moonhub
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight84% of the movement so far
JobDiva28Moonhub300.4 weighted points to Moonhub
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight92% of the movement so far
JobDiva42Moonhub380.3 weighted points to JobDiva
- 7
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
JobDiva38Moonhub400.3 weighted points to Moonhub
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Moonhub, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Moonhub | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 18 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 48 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 22 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 38 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 29F | 30F | -1 | -1.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Moonhub | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.