§ The result
1 point separates Moonhub and JobDiva.
Moonhub (Sourcing) edges JobDiva (ATS-integrated) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 30 to 29. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Moonhub: Moonhub is ahead on Human Oversight Design and JobDiva on Post-Market Monitoring. Human Oversight Design is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (JobDiva 40, Moonhub 48, 12% weight), but it accounts for only 36% of the weighted advantage Moonhub holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Moonhub under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Moonhub is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | JobDiva | Moonhub |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 2022 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 24% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Moonhub 48
1.0 weighted points to Moonhub
12% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Moonhub 22
1.0 weighted points to JobDiva
18% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Moonhub 18
0.5 weighted points to Moonhub
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Moonhub 25
0.4 weighted points to Moonhub
20% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Moonhub 30
0.4 weighted points to Moonhub
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Moonhub 38
0.3 weighted points to JobDiva
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Moonhub 40
0.3 weighted points to Moonhub
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Moonhub.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Moonhub | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 18 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 48 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 22 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 38 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 30 (F) | -1 | -1.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Moonhub | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next