Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) vs Pinpoint
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is an AI talent-sourcing search engine that lets recruiters find, rank, and reach candidates across 800M+ public profiles using natural-language queries instead of Boolean search, with an "Autopilot" agent that scores and ranks profiles against job criteria.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) and Pinpoint tie at 57.
Juicebox (PeopleGPT), filed under Sourcing, and Pinpoint, filed under Screening, tie at 57 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads 2 of the 7 criteria and Pinpoint 5, yet the two totals land on the same number. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84, Pinpoint 42 — and at an 18% weight it carries 95% of the weighted advantage Juicebox (PeopleGPT) holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Juicebox (PeopleGPT)2
- Pinpoint5
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency84 vs 42
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Pinpoint under Screening AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and ATS-integrated.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | JE |
| Founded | 2022 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight46% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)84Pinpoint427.6 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight71% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)52Pinpoint724.0 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight82% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)56Pinpoint681.8 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight92% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)50Pinpoint641.7 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight95% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)60Pinpoint660.5 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 6
FRIA Support
15% weight98% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)35Pinpoint380.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 7
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)55Pinpoint520.4 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -0.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Juicebox (PeopleGPT) minus Pinpoint, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 72 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 84 | 42 | +42 | +7.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 68 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 64 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 57F | 57F | - | -0.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Juicebox (PeopleGPT) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Juicebox (PeopleGPT), across 4 distinct source domains, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Juicebox (PeopleGPT) last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.