HomeCompareKeka vs Loxo

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Keka vs Loxo

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Keka and Loxo tie at 37.

Keka, filed under ATS-integrated, and Loxo, filed under Sourcing, tie at 37 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Keka leads 0 of the 7 criteria and Loxo 1, with 6 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Customer Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Keka 55, Loxo 58 — and at an 8% weight it carries 100% of the weighted advantage Loxo holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.

§ The record

Keka is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Loxo under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Keka is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordKekaLoxo
Price tierLowMid
HeadquartersINUS
Founded20142012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Keka 55 · Loxo 58

    0.2 weighted points to Loxo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 1 figure above sum to -0.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 0.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Keka minus Loxo.

CategoryWeightKekaLoxoΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3030--
Bias Audit Transparency18%2020--
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5050--
Human Oversight Design12%5050--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4040--
Customer Documentation8%5558-3-0.2
Total100%37 (F)37 (F)--0.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightKekaLoxo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%71Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%287Sources on the vendor's own domain127Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Keka has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Loxo has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Keka, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Loxo, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Keka last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Loxo last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.