Side-by-side · Rubric js-v1.0
LoopCV vs Massive
LoopCV
LoopCV is a job-search automation platform that continuously matches a job seeker's CV to postings across 30+ job boards and applies on their behalf via ATS form-fills, LinkedIn Easy Apply, and templated emails to recruiters.
Substantial gaps
Auto-apply
Massive
Massive is an AI job-application copilot that matches roles, generates a tailored resume and cover letter for each job, and auto-fills and submits applications on a job seeker's behalf across job boards and company sites.
Substantial gaps
Auto-apply
The result
LoopCV and Massive tie at 50.
LoopCV and Massive tie at 50 under rubric js-v1.0 inside the Auto-apply cohort, arriving there from different criteria. LoopCV leads 4 of the 7 criteria and Massive 3, yet the two totals land on the same number. Data & Credential Safety, at 20%, is the heaviest weighted swing and goes to Massive (LoopCV 40, Massive 57), 56% of the weighted advantage it holds, while the widest raw gap is Pricing & Cancellation Fairness, LoopCV 65 to Massive 40.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- LoopCV4
- Massive3
- Widest raw gap
- Pricing & Cancellation Fairness65 vs 40
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Data & Credential Safety20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
LoopCV and Massive are both filed under Auto-apply tools. They also share 3 secondary categories: Job matching, Tracker and Resume AI.
| Record | LoopCV | Massive |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | High |
| Headquarters | GR | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2022 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Data & Credential Safety
20% weight29% of the movement so far
LoopCV40Massive573.4 weighted points to Massive
- 2
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
10% weight50% of the movement so far
LoopCV65Massive402.5 weighted points to LoopCV
- 3
Effectiveness Evidence
12% weight70% of the movement so far
LoopCV35Massive552.4 weighted points to Massive
- 4
Support & Accountability
8% weight83% of the movement so far
LoopCV68Massive501.4 weighted points to LoopCV
- 5
Application Honesty
20% weight91% of the movement so far
LoopCV55Massive501.0 weighted points to LoopCV
- 6
User Control & Transparency
15% weight97% of the movement so far
LoopCV60Massive550.8 weighted points to LoopCV
- 7
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
15% weight100% of the movement so far
LoopCV38Massive400.3 weighted points to Massive
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -0.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is LoopCV minus Massive, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | LoopCV | Massive | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 40 | 57 | -17 | -3.4 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 35 | 55 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 65 | 40 | +25 | +2.5 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 68 | 50 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 50F | 50F | - | -0.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | LoopCV | Massive | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 2 | 0 | — | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
LoopCV has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Massive has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LoopCV and Massive sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for LoopCV, across 6 distinct source domains, and 18 for Massive, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- LoopCV last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Massive last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against