§ The result
Sense leads myInterview on all 7 criteria.
Sense finishes 21 points clear of myInterview under rubric v1.0 — 58 against 37 — across the Screening and Video interview cohorts. Sense leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; myInterview leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (myInterview 35, Sense 72, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 31% of the weighted advantage Sense holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Vendor profile
Sense
Sense is a conversational AI talent engagement platform that screens, scores, matches, and schedules candidates for high-volume recruiting via chatbot, SMS/WhatsApp, and voice AI on top of a customer's ATS.
§ The record
myInterview is filed under Video interview AI, Sense under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Scheduling.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only myInterview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | myInterview | Sense |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | AU | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
myInterview 35 · Sense 72
6.7 weighted points to Sense
20% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
myInterview 38 · Sense 60
4.4 weighted points to Sense
15% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
myInterview 42 · Sense 58
2.4 weighted points to Sense
12% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
myInterview 33 · Sense 52
2.3 weighted points to Sense
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
myInterview 25 · Sense 38
1.9 weighted points to Sense
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
myInterview 48 · Sense 64
1.9 weighted points to Sense
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
myInterview 40 · Sense 62
1.8 weighted points to Sense
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -21 beside that -21.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is myInterview minus Sense.
| Category | Weight | myInterview | Sense | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 60 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 72 | -37 | -6.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 58 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 64 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 52 | -19 | -2.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 62 | -22 | -1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 58 (F) | -21 | -21.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | myInterview | Sense | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain | 16 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Sense has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview and Sense sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for Sense, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Sense last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next