HomeComparePhenom vs Talview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Phenom vs Talview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Phenom leads Talview by 10 points.

Phenom sits 10 points above Talview under rubric v1.0 — 52 against 42 — with Phenom filed under Sourcing and Talview under Video interview. Phenom leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Talview leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring, and 1 is level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Phenom 75, Talview 38 — and at an 18% weight it carries 65% of the weighted advantage Phenom holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Phenom is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Talview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordPhenomTalview
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20102012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 63% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Phenom 75 · Talview 38

    6.7 weighted points to Phenom

  2. 15% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Phenom 60 · Talview 48

    1.8 weighted points to Phenom

  3. 20% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Phenom 55 · Talview 50

    1.0 weighted points to Phenom

  4. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Phenom 60 · Talview 55

    0.6 weighted points to Phenom

  5. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Phenom 30 · Talview 32

    0.2 weighted points to Talview

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Phenom 55 · Talview 52

    0.2 weighted points to Phenom

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +10.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +10.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Phenom minus Talview.

CategoryWeightPhenomTalviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5550+5+1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%7538+37+6.7
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%6048+12+1.8
Human Oversight Design12%6055+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3032-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%5552+3+0.2
Total100%52 (F)42 (F)+10+10.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightPhenomTalview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%20Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%0101
Data Governance Disclosure15%10Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%1020Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%82Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain116Sources on the vendor's own domain

Phenom has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 27 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 10 for Phenom, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Phenom last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.