Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Pulsifi vs Zappyhire
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Zappyhire
Zappyhire is an AI-powered recruitment automation platform that screens and ranks candidates through resume parsing, a recruiting chatbot, AI assessments, and robotic video interviews, layered on an applicant tracking system.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
1 point separates Zappyhire and Pulsifi.
Zappyhire holds a 1-point edge over Pulsifi under rubric v1.0, 34 to 33, across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. The criteria split evenly, 2 each to Pulsifi and Zappyhire, with 3 level, and the weighted points on the side Zappyhire holds, headed by Bias Audit Transparency, settle the total. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Pulsifi 20, Zappyhire 28 — and at an 18% weight it carries 83% of the weighted advantage Zappyhire holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Pulsifi2
- Zappyhire2
- Level3
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency20 vs 28
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Pulsifi is filed under Assessment AI, Zappyhire under Screening AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Video interview and ATS-integrated.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Pulsifi | Zappyhire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | SG | IN |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight60% of the movement so far
Pulsifi20Zappyhire281.4 weighted points to Zappyhire
- 2
Human Oversight Design
12% weight84% of the movement so far
Pulsifi55Zappyhire500.6 weighted points to Pulsifi
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight97% of the movement so far
Pulsifi40Zappyhire420.3 weighted points to Zappyhire
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Pulsifi46Zappyhire450.1 weighted points to Pulsifi
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to -1.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Pulsifi minus Zappyhire, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Pulsifi | Zappyhire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 28 | -8 | -1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 28 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 46 | 45 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 33F | 34F | -1 | -1.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Pulsifi | Zappyhire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Zappyhire has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Zappyhire sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Zappyhire, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Zappyhire last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.