Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Radancy vs Recruitee
Radancy
Radancy is an enterprise talent acquisition cloud combining recruitment marketing, career sites and CRM with agentic AI that sources, screens, scores, ranks and schedules candidates, including one-way video screening inherited from its myInterview acquisition.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Recruitee
Collaborative applicant tracking system, part of the Tellent group, with AI-assisted features for job-description generation, screening candidates against team-defined criteria, resurfacing past applicants, and summarizing evaluation feedback.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
1 point separates Recruitee and Radancy.
Recruitee holds a 1-point edge over Radancy under rubric v1.0, 42 to 41, across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. The criteria split evenly, 3 each to Radancy and Recruitee, with 1 level, and the weighted points on the side Recruitee holds, headed by Bias Audit Transparency, settle the total. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Radancy 20, Recruitee 30 — and at an 18% weight it carries 75% of the weighted advantage Recruitee holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Radancy3
- Recruitee3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency20 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Radancy is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Recruitee under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only Radancy is in scope of
| Record | Radancy | Recruitee |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | NL |
| Founded | 2006 | 2015 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight50% of the movement so far
Radancy20Recruitee301.8 weighted points to Recruitee
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight75% of the movement so far
Radancy58Recruitee520.9 weighted points to Radancy
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight88% of the movement so far
Radancy36Recruitee400.5 weighted points to Recruitee
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight93% of the movement so far
Radancy60Recruitee580.2 weighted points to Radancy
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight97% of the movement so far
Radancy28Recruitee270.1 weighted points to Radancy
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Radancy57Recruitee580.1 weighted points to Recruitee
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -1.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Radancy minus Recruitee, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Radancy | Recruitee | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 42 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 30 | -10 | -1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 27 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 52 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 58 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 36 | 40 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 42F | -1 | -1.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Radancy | Recruitee | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Radancy has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for Radancy, across 1 distinct source domain, and 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Radancy last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruitee last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.