Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Saville Assessment vs X0PA AI
Saville Assessment
Saville Assessment publishes the Wave personality questionnaires, Swift aptitude tests and situational judgment tests. They are scored automatically against norm groups and delivered through the Oasys platform, the Wave Connect hiring platform (which uses AI to build role profiles from job descriptions) and a two-minute Screener that returns a fit band into the employer's ATS.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
X0PA AI
X0PA AI is a Singapore-based B2B AI recruitment platform (applicant tracking system) that sources, screens, scores, and ranks candidates using proprietary predictive-scoring models (BRIQ Score and Suitability Score) plus the X0PA ROOM video-interview/assessment product, marketed around bias-reduced, "responsible and explainable" AI hiring.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
Saville Assessment and X0PA AI tie at 48.
Saville Assessment and X0PA AI, both in the Assessment cohort, tie at 48 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Saville Assessment leads 1 of the 7 criteria and X0PA AI 4, with 2 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Saville Assessment 42, X0PA AI 44, 18% weight), is only 36% of the weighted advantage X0PA AI builds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Saville Assessment1
- X0PA AI4
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency42 vs 44
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Saville Assessment and X0PA AI are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Saville Assessment | X0PA AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | High |
| Headquarters | GB | SG |
| Founded | 2004 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight28% of the movement so far
Saville Assessment42X0PA AI440.4 weighted points to X0PA AI
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight51% of the movement so far
Saville Assessment40X0PA AI380.3 weighted points to Saville Assessment
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight70% of the movement so far
Saville Assessment55X0PA AI570.2 weighted points to X0PA AI
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight88% of the movement so far
Saville Assessment38X0PA AI400.2 weighted points to X0PA AI
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Saville Assessment55X0PA AI560.1 weighted points to X0PA AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -0.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 1.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Saville Assessment minus X0PA AI, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Saville Assessment | X0PA AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 50 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 42 | 44 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 38 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 56 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 57 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 48F | 48F | - | -0.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Saville Assessment | X0PA AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; X0PA AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Saville Assessment and X0PA AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for X0PA AI, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Saville Assessment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- X0PA AI last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.