HomeCompareTalogy vs Willo

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Talogy vs Willo

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Talogy takes the total, Willo takes more of the criteria.

Talogy (Assessment) edges Willo (Video interview) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 42 to 41. Willo leads more of the criteria than Talogy — 3 to 2 — but Article 11 Technical Documentation, which Talogy leads, carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Talogy. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Talogy 53, Willo 38 — and at a 20% weight it carries 90% of the weighted advantage Talogy holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Talogy is filed under Assessment AI, Willo under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordTalogyWillo
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded19462018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 58% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Talogy 53 · Willo 38

    3.0 weighted points to Talogy

  2. 12% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Talogy 52 · Willo 62

    1.2 weighted points to Willo

  3. 12% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Talogy 32 · Willo 36

    0.5 weighted points to Willo

  4. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Talogy 58 · Willo 54

    0.3 weighted points to Talogy

  5. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Talogy 52 · Willo 53

    0.1 weighted points to Willo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +1.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Talogy minus Willo.

CategoryWeightTalogyWilloΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5338+15+3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3030--
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5253-1-0.1
Human Oversight Design12%5262-10-1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3236-4-0.5
Customer Documentation8%5854+4+0.3
Total100%42 (F)41 (F)+1+1.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightTalogyWillo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%32Sources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%1201
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%229Sources on the vendor's own domain95Sources on the vendor's own domain

Talogy has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 22 with a source URL, 9 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for Talogy, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Talogy last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Willo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.