The result

Talview and Tengai tie at 42.

Talview, filed under Video interview, and Tengai, filed under Screening, tie at 42 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Talview leads 2 of the 7 criteria and Tengai 5, yet the two totals land on the same number. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Talview 50, Tengai 45 — and at a 20% weight it carries 53% of the weighted advantage Talview holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Talview2
  • Tengai5
Widest raw gap
Article 11 Technical Documentation50 vs 45
Heaviest weighted swing
Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Talview is filed under Video interview AI, Tengai under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.

RecordTalviewTengai
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSSE
Founded20122019

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight30% of the movement so far

    Talview50
    Tengai45

    1.0 weighted points to Talview

  2. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight56% of the movement so far

    Talview38
    Tengai33

    0.9 weighted points to Talview

  3. FRIA Support

    15% weight70% of the movement so far

    Talview25
    Tengai28

    0.4 weighted points to Tengai

  4. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight80% of the movement so far

    Talview55
    Tengai58

    0.4 weighted points to Tengai

  5. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight89% of the movement so far

    Talview48
    Tengai50

    0.3 weighted points to Tengai

  6. Customer Documentation

    8% weight96% of the movement so far

    Talview52
    Tengai55

    0.2 weighted points to Tengai

  7. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight100% of the movement so far

    Talview32
    Tengai33

    0.1 weighted points to Tengai

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.4.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Talview minus Tengai, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightTalviewTengaiΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5045+5+1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3833+5+0.9
FRIA Support15%2528-3-0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%4850-2-0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5558-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3233-1-0.1
Customer Documentation8%5255-3-0.2
Total100%42F42F-+0.4

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightTalviewTengai
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain71Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—51Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%01—41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%116Sources on the vendor's own domain375Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Tengai has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 37 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tengai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain, and 42 for Tengai, across 4 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tengai last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next