Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
TestDome vs Turing
TestDome
TestDome sells pay-per-candidate online skills tests for coding, Excel and more than 100 other skills. The tests are scored automatically, and open-ended answers can be scored by AI. AI analysis of webcam and screen proctoring recordings flags possible cheating, and a live code-interview tool is included.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates TestDome and Turing.
Under rubric v1.0, TestDome and Turing finish 1 point apart, 37 to 36, as two Assessment entries. TestDome leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Customer Documentation, while Turing leads 2, including Bias Audit Transparency. Bias Audit Transparency is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to Turing — TestDome 15, Turing 28, on an 18% weight — which is 85% of the weighted advantage Turing holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- TestDome5
- Turing2
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency15 vs 28
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
TestDome and Turing are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | TestDome | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | HR | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight37% of the movement so far
TestDome15Turing282.3 weighted points to Turing
- 2
Customer Documentation
8% weight53% of the movement so far
TestDome60Turing481.0 weighted points to TestDome
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight67% of the movement so far
TestDome50Turing440.9 weighted points to TestDome
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight81% of the movement so far
TestDome52Turing450.8 weighted points to TestDome
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight88% of the movement so far
TestDome28Turing250.4 weighted points to TestDome
- 6
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight94% of the movement so far
TestDome40Turing420.4 weighted points to Turing
- 7
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
TestDome30Turing270.4 weighted points to TestDome
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +0.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is TestDome minus Turing, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | TestDome | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 28 | -13 | -2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 44 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 45 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 27 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 37F | 36F | +1 | +0.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | TestDome | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
TestDome has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for TestDome, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- TestDome last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against