Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
365Talents vs Testlify
365Talents
365Talents is an AI skills-intelligence and internal talent-marketplace platform that infers employees' skills from HRIS records, CVs, documents and collaboration tools, then matches them to internal jobs, projects, gigs, mentors, learning and succession pipelines.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Testlify
Testlify is a skills-assessment and AI-interviewing platform that ranks candidates on a scored leaderboard from pre-built or AI-generated tests, with an AI résumé screener, AI-scored video, voice and chat interviews, and AI-assisted proctoring.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates 365Talents and Testlify.
365Talents (Sourcing) edges Testlify (Assessment) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 46 to 45. 365Talents leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Testlify leads 2, including Bias Audit Transparency. Article 11 Technical Documentation, at 20%, is the heaviest weighted swing and goes to 365Talents (365Talents 63, Testlify 52), 64% of the weighted advantage it holds, while the widest raw gap is Bias Audit Transparency, 365Talents 18 to Testlify 30.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- 365Talents5
- Testlify2
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency18 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
365Talents is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Testlify under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | 365Talents | Testlify |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | FR | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2022 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight38% of the movement so far
365Talents63Testlify522.2 weighted points to 365Talents
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight75% of the movement so far
365Talents18Testlify302.2 weighted points to Testlify
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight83% of the movement so far
365Talents58Testlify550.4 weighted points to 365Talents
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight88% of the movement so far
365Talents35Testlify330.3 weighted points to 365Talents
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight92% of the movement so far
365Talents57Testlify550.2 weighted points to 365Talents
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight96% of the movement so far
365Talents44Testlify420.2 weighted points to 365Talents
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
365Talents57Testlify600.2 weighted points to Testlify
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is 365Talents minus Testlify, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | 365Talents | Testlify | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 63 | 52 | +11 | +2.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 30 | -12 | -2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 33 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 55 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 42 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 60 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 45F | +1 | +1.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | 365Talents | Testlify | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 31 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 31 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Testlify has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 74 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 36 for Testlify, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- 365Talents last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Testlify last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.