The result

1 point separates Canditech and Alooba.

Canditech holds a 1-point edge over Alooba under rubric v1.0, 39 to 38, with both scored in the Assessment cohort. Alooba and Canditech each lead 3 of the 7 criteria, with 1 level, though the side of the split Canditech holds (headed by Data Governance Disclosure) adds up to more weighted points. One criterion, Data Governance Disclosure, is both the widest raw gap (Alooba 45, Canditech 52) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 15% weight it makes up 56% of the weighted advantage Canditech holds across the 3 criteria it leads.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Alooba3
  • Canditech3
  • Level1
Widest raw gap
Data Governance Disclosure45 vs 52
Heaviest weighted swing
Data Governance Disclosure15% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Alooba and Canditech are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

RecordAloobaCanditech
Price tierLowMid
HeadquartersAUIL
Founded20192019

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight33% of the movement so far

    Alooba45
    Canditech52

    1.1 weighted points to Canditech

  2. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight51% of the movement so far

    Alooba40
    Canditech37

    0.6 weighted points to Alooba

  3. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight68% of the movement so far

    Alooba22
    Canditech25

    0.5 weighted points to Canditech

  4. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight83% of the movement so far

    Alooba36
    Canditech32

    0.5 weighted points to Alooba

  5. FRIA Support

    15% weight93% of the movement so far

    Alooba28
    Canditech30

    0.3 weighted points to Canditech

  6. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight100% of the movement so far

    Alooba55
    Canditech53

    0.2 weighted points to Alooba

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -0.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.6.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Alooba minus Canditech, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightAloobaCanditechΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4037+3+0.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%2225-3-0.5
FRIA Support15%2830-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%4552-7-1.1
Human Oversight Design12%5553+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3632+4+0.5
Customer Documentation8%5858--
Total100%38F39F-1-0.6

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightAloobaCanditech
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—11—
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%286Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain117Sources on the vendor's own domain

Alooba has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Canditech has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Alooba sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Alooba, across 3 distinct source domains, and 18 for Canditech, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Alooba last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Canditech last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next