§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads AmazingHiring on all 7 criteria.
Workday Recruiting AI finishes 19 points clear of AmazingHiring under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 37 — across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Workday Recruiting AI leads every one of the 7 criteria, AmazingHiring none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, AmazingHiring 33 to Workday Recruiting AI 35. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Bias Audit Transparency (AmazingHiring 22, Workday Recruiting AI 60) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (AmazingHiring 35, Workday Recruiting AI 70), the second being 38% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
AmazingHiring
A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
AmazingHiring is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144.
| Record | AmazingHiring | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
AmazingHiring 35 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
7.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
18% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
AmazingHiring 22 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
6.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
AmazingHiring 48 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
2.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
AmazingHiring 52 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
AmazingHiring 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
AmazingHiring 50 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
0.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
AmazingHiring 33 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -19 beside that -18.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is AmazingHiring minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | AmazingHiring | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 70 | -35 | -7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 60 | -38 | -6.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 55 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 65 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 35 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 65 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 56 (F) | -19 | -18.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | AmazingHiring | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
AmazingHiring has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 29 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for AmazingHiring, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- AmazingHiring last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.