Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Aon Assessment vs HireLogic
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
Aon Assessment takes the total, HireLogic takes more of the criteria.
Aon Assessment (Assessment) edges HireLogic (Video interview) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 35 to 34. HireLogic leads more of the criteria than Aon Assessment — 4 to 2 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Aon Assessment leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Aon Assessment. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Aon Assessment 30, HireLogic 15) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 92% of the weighted advantage Aon Assessment holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Aon Assessment2
- HireLogic4
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency30 vs 15
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, HireLogic under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Aon Assessment | HireLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | DE | US |
| Founded | 2002 | Not recorded |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight53% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment30HireLogic152.7 weighted points to Aon Assessment
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight73% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment38HireLogic451.1 weighted points to HireLogic
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight81% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment40HireLogic420.4 weighted points to HireLogic
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight88% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment45HireLogic480.4 weighted points to HireLogic
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight95% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment25HireLogic280.4 weighted points to HireLogic
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Aon Assessment48HireLogic450.2 weighted points to Aon Assessment
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +0.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +0.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus HireLogic, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | HireLogic | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 15 | +15 | +2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 45 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 48 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 45 | +3 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 35F | 34F | +1 | +0.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | HireLogic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.