HomeCompareBryq vs HireVue

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Bryq vs HireVue

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

HireVue takes the total, Bryq takes more of the criteria.

HireVue (Video interview) edges Bryq (Assessment) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 58 to 57. Bryq leads more of the criteria than HireVue — 4 to 3 — but Article 11 Technical Documentation, which HireVue leads, carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to HireVue. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Bryq 54, HireVue 65 — and at a 20% weight it carries 47% of the weighted advantage HireVue holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Bryq is filed under Assessment AI, HireVue under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBryqHireVue
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20172004

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 26% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Bryq 54 · HireVue 65

    2.2 weighted points to HireVue

  2. 18% weight · 47% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Bryq 70 · HireVue 80

    1.8 weighted points to HireVue

  3. 12% weight · 60% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Bryq 55 · HireVue 45

    1.2 weighted points to Bryq

  4. 15% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Bryq 62 · HireVue 55

    1.1 weighted points to Bryq

  5. 8% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Bryq 66 · HireVue 55

    0.9 weighted points to Bryq

  6. 15% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Bryq 40 · HireVue 35

    0.8 weighted points to Bryq

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Bryq 54 · HireVue 60

    0.7 weighted points to HireVue

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -0.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Bryq minus HireVue.

CategoryWeightBryqHireVueΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5465-11-2.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%7080-10-1.8
FRIA Support15%4035+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%6255+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%5460-6-0.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%5545+10+1.2
Customer Documentation8%6655+11+0.9
Total100%57 (F)58 (F)-1-0.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBryqHireVue
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Data Governance Disclosure15%40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11
Customer Documentation8%40Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%204Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain132Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Bryq has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Bryq and HireVue sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for Bryq, across 4 distinct source domains, and 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Bryq last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireVue last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.