Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Entelo vs JobDiva
Entelo
Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
4 points separate Entelo and JobDiva.
Entelo holds a 4-point edge over JobDiva under rubric v1.0, 33 to 29, across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. Entelo leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while JobDiva leads 1, including Customer Documentation. Even Data Governance Disclosure, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Entelo 45, JobDiva 38, 15% weight), is only 29% of the weighted advantage Entelo builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Entelo6
- JobDiva1
- Widest raw gap
- Data Governance Disclosure45 vs 38
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Data Governance Disclosure15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Entelo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Entelo is in scope of
| Record | Entelo | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2003 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight28% of the movement so far
Entelo45JobDiva381.1 weighted points to Entelo
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight51% of the movement so far
Entelo20JobDiva150.9 weighted points to Entelo
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight67% of the movement so far
Entelo35JobDiva300.6 weighted points to Entelo
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight79% of the movement so far
Entelo25JobDiva220.4 weighted points to Entelo
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight89% of the movement so far
Entelo30JobDiva280.4 weighted points to Entelo
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight96% of the movement so far
Entelo42JobDiva400.2 weighted points to Entelo
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Entelo40JobDiva420.2 weighted points to JobDiva
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +3.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Entelo minus JobDiva, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Entelo | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 15 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 38 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 42 | 40 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 33F | 29F | +4 | +3.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Entelo | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Entelo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.