Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
eSkill vs Talogy
eSkill
eSkill is a pre-employment testing platform with auto-scored skills, cognitive and behavioral tests and human-rated one-way video interviews, plus an optional Proctorio-powered AI proctoring add-on that gives each candidate a suspicion score and a Claude-based "Linea" layer that drafts assessments from job descriptions.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Talogy
Talogy sells psychometric talent-assessment products - cognitive ability tests (Logiks, Mindgage), personality inventories (Caliper, P.A.P.I.), values-based screening, situational judgement and job simulations, and 360 feedback - delivered through its TalogyTech platform for candidate selection and employee development.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates Talogy and eSkill.
Under rubric v1.0, Talogy and eSkill finish 1 point apart, 42 to 41, as two Assessment entries. The 7 criteria split 4 to 3 in favour of Talogy: Talogy is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and eSkill on FRIA Support. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (eSkill 48, Talogy 53, 20% weight), is only 36% of the weighted advantage Talogy builds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- eSkill3
- Talogy4
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation48 vs 53
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
eSkill and Talogy are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | eSkill | Talogy |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 1946 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight22% of the movement so far
eSkill48Talogy531.0 weighted points to Talogy
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight41% of the movement so far
eSkill25Talogy300.9 weighted points to Talogy
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight57% of the movement so far
eSkill30Talogy250.8 weighted points to eSkill
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight73% of the movement so far
eSkill47Talogy520.8 weighted points to Talogy
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight86% of the movement so far
eSkill57Talogy520.6 weighted points to eSkill
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight97% of the movement so far
eSkill36Talogy320.5 weighted points to eSkill
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
eSkill56Talogy580.2 weighted points to Talogy
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is eSkill minus Talogy, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | eSkill | Talogy | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 53 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 47 | 52 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 52 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 36 | 32 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 56 | 58 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 42F | -1 | -1.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | eSkill | Talogy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 22 | 9 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
eSkill has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Talogy has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 22 with a source URL, 9 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for eSkill sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for eSkill, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for Talogy, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- eSkill last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Talogy last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against