Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs X0PA AI
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
X0PA AI
X0PA AI is a Singapore-based B2B AI recruitment platform (applicant tracking system) that sources, screens, scores, and ranks candidates using proprietary predictive-scoring models (BRIQ Score and Suitability Score) plus the X0PA ROOM video-interview/assessment product, marketed around bias-reduced, "responsible and explainable" AI hiring.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
X0PA AI takes the total, Gloat takes more of the criteria.
X0PA AI holds a 1-point edge over Gloat under rubric v1.0, 48 to 47, across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Gloat leads more of the criteria, 4 against 3 for X0PA AI, yet X0PA AI takes FRIA Support, which carries 15% of the rubric, and the weighted sum with it. FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Gloat 28, X0PA AI 38 — and at a 15% weight it carries 50% of the weighted advantage X0PA AI holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat4
- X0PA AI3
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support28 vs 38
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, X0PA AI under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | X0PA AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | High |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight35% of the movement so far
Gloat28X0PA AI381.5 weighted points to X0PA AI
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight60% of the movement so far
Gloat38X0PA AI441.1 weighted points to X0PA AI
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight74% of the movement so far
Gloat62X0PA AI570.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight84% of the movement so far
Gloat48X0PA AI500.4 weighted points to X0PA AI
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight91% of the movement so far
Gloat58X0PA AI560.3 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight96% of the movement so far
Gloat42X0PA AI400.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat62X0PA AI600.2 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus X0PA AI, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | X0PA AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 50 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 44 | -6 | -1.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 38 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 56 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 57 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 40 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 48F | -1 | -1.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | X0PA AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; X0PA AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for X0PA AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for X0PA AI, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- X0PA AI last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.