§ The result
Harver leads HireQuotient by 22 points.
Harver finishes 22 points clear of HireQuotient under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 34 — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. Harver leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while HireQuotient leads 1, including Human Oversight Design. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Harver 80, HireQuotient 18) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 48% of the weighted advantage Harver holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Harver
Pre-employment assessment suite covering cognitive ability, behavioral, and situational judgement, including the legacy Pymetrics games product.
Vendor profile
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
§ The record
Harver is filed under Assessment AI, HireQuotient under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Harver | HireQuotient |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | NL | SG |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Harver 80 · HireQuotient 18
11.2 weighted points to Harver
20% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Harver 65 · HireQuotient 35
6.0 weighted points to Harver
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Harver 55 · HireQuotient 40
2.3 weighted points to Harver
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Harver 35 · HireQuotient 22
1.9 weighted points to Harver
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Harver 40 · HireQuotient 30
1.2 weighted points to Harver
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Harver 50 · HireQuotient 57
0.8 weighted points to HireQuotient
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Harver 60 · HireQuotient 50
0.8 weighted points to Harver
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +22.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +22 beside that +22.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harver minus HireQuotient.
| Category | Weight | Harver | HireQuotient | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 35 | +30 | +6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 18 | +62 | +11.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 22 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 57 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 34 (F) | +22 | +22.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harver | HireQuotient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 10 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Harver has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 0 documented absences; HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 10 for Harver, across 1 distinct source domain, and 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harver last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next