§ The result
Maki People leads HeroHunt.ai on all 7 criteria.
Maki People (Assessment) and HeroHunt.ai (Sourcing) are 37 points apart under rubric v1.0, 67 (D) for Maki People against 30 (F) for HeroHunt.ai. HeroHunt.ai leads none of the 7 criteria, and Maki People is ahead on 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. The advantage Maki People holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HeroHunt.ai 10, Maki People 80, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 35% of the weighted points Maki People gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
§ The record
HeroHunt.ai is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Maki People under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Maki People is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeroHunt.ai | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | NL | FR |
| Founded | 2021 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeroHunt.ai 10 · Maki People 80
12.6 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 20 · Maki People 64
8.8 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeroHunt.ai 27 · Maki People 62
5.3 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeroHunt.ai 28 · Maki People 55
3.2 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeroHunt.ai 45 · Maki People 64
2.9 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeroHunt.ai 48 · Maki People 74
2.1 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeroHunt.ai 55 · Maki People 66
1.3 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -36.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 36.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -37 beside that -36.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeroHunt.ai minus Maki People.
| Category | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 20 | 64 | -44 | -8.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 10 | 80 | -70 | -12.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 62 | -35 | -5.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 64 | -19 | -2.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 66 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 55 | -27 | -3.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 74 | -26 | -2.1 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 67 (D) | -37 | -36.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeroHunt.ai | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeroHunt.ai and Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next