Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HiPeople vs HireVue
HiPeople
HiPeople is a Berlin-based hiring platform combining a 400+ test skills and personality assessment library, automated AI reference checks, AI resume/application screening that scores candidates against job criteria, and AI screening calls.
Concerning
Assessment
HireVue
Asynchronous video interviewing platform with optional AI-driven assessment scoring of candidate responses.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
3 points separate HiPeople and HireVue.
HiPeople holds a 3-point edge over HireVue under rubric v1.0, 61 (D) to 58 (F), across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of HiPeople, with 1 level: HiPeople is ahead on Post-Market Monitoring and HireVue on Article 11 Technical Documentation. Post-Market Monitoring is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HiPeople 60, HireVue 45 — and at a 12% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage HiPeople holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HiPeople5
- HireVue1
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring60 vs 45
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Post-Market Monitoring12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HiPeople is filed under Assessment AI, HireVue under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HiPeople | HireVue |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | DE | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2004 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight38% of the movement so far
HiPeople60HireVue451.8 weighted points to HiPeople
- 2
Customer Documentation
8% weight57% of the movement so far
HiPeople66HireVue550.9 weighted points to HiPeople
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight72% of the movement so far
HiPeople84HireVue800.7 weighted points to HiPeople
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight85% of the movement so far
HiPeople62HireVue650.6 weighted points to HireVue
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight95% of the movement so far
HiPeople58HireVue550.4 weighted points to HiPeople
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
HiPeople62HireVue600.2 weighted points to HiPeople
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +3.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiPeople minus HireVue, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HiPeople | HireVue | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 62 | 65 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 84 | 80 | +4 | +0.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 45 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 55 | +11 | +0.9 |
| Total | 100% | 61D | 58F | +3 | +3.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiPeople | HireVue | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HiPeople has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HiPeople and HireVue sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for HiPeople, across 3 distinct source domains, and 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiPeople last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireVue last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.