§ The result
HireLogic and HireQuotient tie at 34.
HireLogic (Video interview) and HireQuotient (Sourcing) tie at 34 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. HireLogic leads 3 of the 7 criteria and HireQuotient 4, yet the two totals land on the same number. Article 11 Technical Documentation, at 20%, is the heaviest weighted swing and goes to HireLogic (HireLogic 42, HireQuotient 35), 54% of the weighted advantage it holds, while the widest raw gap is Human Oversight Design, HireLogic 48 to HireQuotient 57.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Vendor profile
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
§ The record
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, HireQuotient under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | HireLogic | HireQuotient |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Low |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireLogic 42 · HireQuotient 35
1.4 weighted points to HireLogic
12% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireLogic 48 · HireQuotient 57
1.1 weighted points to HireQuotient
15% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireLogic 45 · HireQuotient 40
0.8 weighted points to HireLogic
18% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireLogic 15 · HireQuotient 18
0.5 weighted points to HireQuotient
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireLogic 25 · HireQuotient 22
0.4 weighted points to HireLogic
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireLogic 45 · HireQuotient 50
0.4 weighted points to HireQuotient
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireLogic 28 · HireQuotient 30
0.2 weighted points to HireQuotient
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus HireQuotient.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | HireQuotient | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 35 | +7 | +1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 18 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 40 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 57 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 50 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 34 (F) | 34 (F) | - | +0.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | HireQuotient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next