Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HireLogic vs HireQuotient
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
HireLogic and HireQuotient tie at 34.
HireLogic (Video interview) and HireQuotient (Sourcing) tie at 34 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. HireLogic leads 3 of the 7 criteria and HireQuotient 4, yet the two totals land on the same number. Article 11 Technical Documentation, at 20%, is the heaviest weighted swing and goes to HireLogic (HireLogic 42, HireQuotient 35), 54% of the weighted advantage it holds, while the widest raw gap is Human Oversight Design, HireLogic 48 to HireQuotient 57.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HireLogic3
- HireQuotient4
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design48 vs 57
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HireLogic is filed under Video interview AI, HireQuotient under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HireLogic | HireQuotient |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Low |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2021 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight29% of the movement so far
HireLogic42HireQuotient351.4 weighted points to HireLogic
- 2
Human Oversight Design
12% weight51% of the movement so far
HireLogic48HireQuotient571.1 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight66% of the movement so far
HireLogic45HireQuotient400.8 weighted points to HireLogic
- 4
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight78% of the movement so far
HireLogic15HireQuotient180.5 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight87% of the movement so far
HireLogic25HireQuotient220.4 weighted points to HireLogic
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight95% of the movement so far
HireLogic45HireQuotient500.4 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 7
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
HireLogic28HireQuotient300.2 weighted points to HireQuotient
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus HireQuotient, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | HireQuotient | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 35 | +7 | +1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 18 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 40 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 57 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 50 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 34F | 34F | - | +0.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | HireQuotient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.