Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HireLogic vs Intervue.io
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
3 points separate HireLogic and Intervue.io.
HireLogic holds a 3-point edge over Intervue.io under rubric v1.0, 34 to 31, with both scored in the Video interview cohort. Intervue.io takes 3 of the 7 criteria, Human Oversight Design among them, against 4 for HireLogic, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireLogic 42, Intervue.io 28 — and at a 20% weight it carries 58% of the weighted advantage HireLogic holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HireLogic4
- Intervue.io3
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation42 vs 28
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HireLogic and Intervue.io are both filed under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HireLogic | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2020 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight45% of the movement so far
HireLogic42Intervue.io282.8 weighted points to HireLogic
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight62% of the movement so far
HireLogic45Intervue.io381.1 weighted points to HireLogic
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight74% of the movement so far
HireLogic48Intervue.io540.7 weighted points to Intervue.io
- 4
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight82% of the movement so far
HireLogic15Intervue.io120.5 weighted points to HireLogic
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight90% of the movement so far
HireLogic25Intervue.io220.4 weighted points to HireLogic
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight96% of the movement so far
HireLogic45Intervue.io500.4 weighted points to Intervue.io
- 7
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
HireLogic28Intervue.io300.2 weighted points to Intervue.io
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireLogic minus Intervue.io, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HireLogic | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 28 | +14 | +2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 12 | +3 | +0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 38 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 54 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 50 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 34F | 31F | +3 | +3.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireLogic | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.