Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HirePro vs TestDome
HirePro
HirePro's AI Recruiter matches resumes to a job, shortlists candidates and runs AI-led interviews that score each answer with written reasoning and a fraud and identity check, alongside proctored assessments, video interviews and campus-hiring workflows.
Substantial gaps
Screening
TestDome
TestDome sells pay-per-candidate online skills tests for coding, Excel and more than 100 other skills. The tests are scored automatically, and open-ended answers can be scored by AI. AI analysis of webcam and screen proctoring recordings flags possible cheating, and a live code-interview tool is included.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates HirePro and TestDome.
HirePro holds a 1-point edge over TestDome under rubric v1.0, 38 to 37, across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. The criteria split evenly, 3 each to HirePro and TestDome, with 1 level, and the weighted points on the side HirePro holds, headed by Bias Audit Transparency, settle the total. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HirePro 33, TestDome 15 — and at an 18% weight it carries 77% of the weighted advantage HirePro holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HirePro3
- TestDome3
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency33 vs 15
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HirePro is filed under Screening AI, TestDome under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HirePro | TestDome |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | IN | HR |
| Founded | 2004 | 2013 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight44% of the movement so far
HirePro33TestDome153.2 weighted points to HirePro
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight72% of the movement so far
HirePro30TestDome402.0 weighted points to TestDome
- 3
Customer Documentation
8% weight81% of the movement so far
HirePro52TestDome600.6 weighted points to TestDome
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight89% of the movement so far
HirePro35TestDome300.6 weighted points to HirePro
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight95% of the movement so far
HirePro25TestDome280.4 weighted points to TestDome
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
HirePro55TestDome520.4 weighted points to HirePro
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HirePro minus TestDome, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HirePro | TestDome | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 33 | 15 | +18 | +3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 50 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 38F | 37F | +1 | +1.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HirePro | TestDome | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 27 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; TestDome has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain, and 31 for TestDome, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HirePro last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- TestDome last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.