Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HireQuotient vs Pulsifi
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates HireQuotient and Pulsifi.
HireQuotient (Sourcing) edges Pulsifi (Assessment) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 34 to 33. Pulsifi takes 2 of the 7 criteria, FRIA Support among them, against 4 for HireQuotient, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation, and 1 is level. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (HireQuotient 35, Pulsifi 30) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 56% of the weighted advantage HireQuotient holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HireQuotient4
- Pulsifi2
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation35 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Pulsifi under Assessment AI. They also share 3 secondary categories: Screening, ATS-integrated and Video interview.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HireQuotient | Pulsifi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | SG | SG |
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight38% of the movement so far
HireQuotient35Pulsifi301.0 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight56% of the movement so far
HireQuotient22Pulsifi250.4 weighted points to Pulsifi
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight69% of the movement so far
HireQuotient18Pulsifi200.4 weighted points to Pulsifi
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight82% of the movement so far
HireQuotient50Pulsifi460.3 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight91% of the movement so far
HireQuotient57Pulsifi550.2 weighted points to HireQuotient
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
HireQuotient30Pulsifi280.2 weighted points to HireQuotient
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireQuotient minus Pulsifi, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HireQuotient | Pulsifi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 20 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 40 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 55 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 46 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 34F | 33F | +1 | +1.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireQuotient | Pulsifi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.