HomeCompareHireQuotient vs SmartRecruiters

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HireQuotient vs SmartRecruiters

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SmartRecruiters leads HireQuotient on all 7 criteria.

SmartRecruiters (ATS-integrated) and HireQuotient (Sourcing) are 28 points apart under rubric v1.0, 62 (D) for SmartRecruiters against 34 (F) for HireQuotient. HireQuotient leads none of the 7 criteria, and SmartRecruiters is ahead on 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. The advantage SmartRecruiters holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HireQuotient 18, SmartRecruiters 78, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 38% of the weighted points SmartRecruiters gains across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

HireQuotient is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, SmartRecruiters under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireQuotient is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHireQuotientSmartRecruiters
Price tierLowEnterprise
HeadquartersSGUS
Founded20212010

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 38% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HireQuotient 18 · SmartRecruiters 78

    10.8 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  2. 20% weight · 63% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HireQuotient 35 · SmartRecruiters 70

    7.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  3. 15% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HireQuotient 22 · SmartRecruiters 45

    3.4 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  4. 15% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HireQuotient 40 · SmartRecruiters 62

    3.3 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  5. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HireQuotient 30 · SmartRecruiters 48

    2.2 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  6. 8% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HireQuotient 50 · SmartRecruiters 63

    1.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HireQuotient 57 · SmartRecruiters 62

    0.6 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -28.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 28.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -28 beside that -28.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HireQuotient minus SmartRecruiters.

CategoryWeightHireQuotientSmartRecruitersΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3570-35-7.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%1878-60-10.8
FRIA Support15%2245-23-3.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%4062-22-3.3
Human Oversight Design12%5762-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3048-18-2.2
Customer Documentation8%5063-13-1.0
Total100%34 (F)62 (D)-28-28.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHireQuotientSmartRecruiters
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain10Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%245Sources on the vendor's own domain112Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; SmartRecruiters has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SmartRecruiters sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for SmartRecruiters, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HireQuotient last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SmartRecruiters last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.