§ The result
HireVue leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
HireVue and Intervue.io, both Video interview entries, are 27 points apart under rubric v1.0, 58 for HireVue against 31 for Intervue.io. HireVue leads every one of the 7 criteria, Intervue.io none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Customer Documentation, HireVue 55 to Intervue.io 50. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HireVue 80, Intervue.io 12 — and at an 18% weight it carries 45% of the weighted advantage HireVue holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HireVue
Asynchronous video interviewing platform with optional AI-driven assessment scoring of candidate responses.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
§ The record
HireVue and Intervue.io are both filed under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Mobley v. Workday, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | HireVue | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2004 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HireVue 80 · Intervue.io 12
12.2 weighted points to HireVue
20% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HireVue 65 · Intervue.io 28
7.4 weighted points to HireVue
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HireVue 55 · Intervue.io 38
2.5 weighted points to HireVue
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HireVue 35 · Intervue.io 22
1.9 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HireVue 45 · Intervue.io 30
1.8 weighted points to HireVue
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HireVue 60 · Intervue.io 54
0.7 weighted points to HireVue
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HireVue 55 · Intervue.io 50
0.4 weighted points to HireVue
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +27.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +27 beside that +27.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HireVue minus Intervue.io.
| Category | Weight | HireVue | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 65 | 28 | +37 | +7.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 12 | +68 | +12.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 22 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 38 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 54 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 30 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 58 (F) | 31 (F) | +27 | +27.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HireVue | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HireVue and Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HireVue last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next